Though store-bought beer bongs ensure there are two scantily clad ladies for every man in attendance... |

Let's start with the volume. For calculation purposes, we'll split the beer bong into three parts: the hose, the conical part of the funnel, and the cylindrical top of the funnel (if you have one). To simplify things, we'll assume that the little exit tube at the bottom of the funnel is just part of the hose. The volumes of beer in the hose and the cylindrical portion of the funnel are calculated using the cylindrical volume formula:

where

*D*and*L*are the diameter and length of the cylinder, respectively. The conical part of the funnel is a cone with the tip cut off, known as a conical frustum. The volume of a conical frustum is:where

*L*is the height of the frustum and

*D1*and

*D2*are the two end diameters. So, defining our beer bong geometry as in the figure below

Notation for beer bong geometry. |

the volume of beer in the beer bong is calculated as

*D*'s and

*L*'s are in centimetres and

*V*is in millilitres. If your funnel doesn't have a "hopper" portion,

*Lfh*= 0. Divide

*V*by 341 mL/bottle if you want to know how many bottles the full beer bong is equivalent to.

If you prefer US Customary units, use this formula instead:

where the

So that's the answer to "how much beer does it hold?" Now for some fluid mechanics to calculate the beer velocity. We're just going to calculate the initial velocity, which is when the beer flows fastest. As the beer drains, the flow rate slows down. We start with the energy equation for fluid flow, which is

where the subscripts 1 and 2 represent two points along the flow path,

For the beer bong, we're interested in the exit velocity, so we'll make the end of the hose point 2. We'll make the surface of the beer in the funnel point 1. Both point 1 and point 2 are exposed to atmosphere, so we can take

Now the energy equation looks like this

According to the law of conservation of mass for incompressible fluids, the flow rate (unit volume per unit time) of the beer must be constant. We can use this to relate

We can measure

where

If you want volumetric flow rate, just add the following calculation step:

If you use centimetres for

We can make this approximation even easier by assuming the funnel diameter is much larger than the hose diameter (which is probably true), making the denominator of the above velocity expression very nearly 1.0, and the exit velocity is simply

As you'll see later in an example, ignoring energy losses isn't going to give you a very accurate answer, and your friends aren't going to accept some lousy ballpark estimate. So the math's going to get more intense, but I paid good money for my fluid mechanics course in university and I'll be damned if I don't find a way to put that knowledge to use.

It's safe to assume turbulent flow in the hose, and although the beer is moving much more slowly in the funnel, it's probably also in the turbulent flow regime. The kinetic energy correction factor varies depending on fluid velocity, viscosity, and pipe roughness, but a typical number is about 1.05. I'm going to assume

I'm going to assume hydraulic head losses come from two sources, friction inside the hose, and the flow contraction at the funnel cone. I'm ignoring the effect of the bend in the hose, which should be okay if the bend radius is much larger than the hose diameter, but if you put a tight bend in the hose you are introducing additional losses. For the flow contraction,

Where

The friction loss in the hose is calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation

where

Now things start to get more complicated. The friction factor is an empirical value that's a function of the pipe roughness, diameter, flow velocity, and fluid viscosity. But your beer bong's probably going to be made with smooth plastic or rubber hose, so we can assume a perfectly smooth pipe (i.e. ignore pipe roughness). If you're doing something crazy like using cast iron or bamboo or hollowed out whalebone, you might want to consider the pipe roughness.

The Colebrook equation is typically cited for calculating the friction factor, but it's an implicit equation, meaning you can't solve the friction factor directly, you need to solve using an iterative process. For a perfectly smooth pipe, the Colebrook equation is

where Re is the Reynolds number, which for the beer bong hose is equal to

where

Since we still don't know what

You could also use the approximate value of

Substituting values of 980.7 cm/s² for

where

Let's do an example based on a hypothetical beer bong with some clever name like

Even though it's a smooth hose, friction has a pretty significant effect in this example, reducing the initial velocity of the beer by almost 40%. And just so you can see that our beastly-looking equation really does get you close to the "exact" iterative solution, here's what I get from Excel using the Colebrook equation for the friction factor:

Potter, M.C. and Wiggert, D.C. (2002).

*D*'s and*L*'s are in inches and*V*is in US fluid ounces.So that's the answer to "how much beer does it hold?" Now for some fluid mechanics to calculate the beer velocity. We're just going to calculate the initial velocity, which is when the beer flows fastest. As the beer drains, the flow rate slows down. We start with the energy equation for fluid flow, which is

where the subscripts 1 and 2 represent two points along the flow path,

*u*is the flow velocity (we already used*V*for volume),*g*is the acceleration due to gravity (= 9.807 m/s² = 32.18 ft/s²),*z*is the height above some arbitrary reference point,*p*is the static fluid pressure,*ɣ*is the fluid's specific weight,*α*is the kinetic energy correction factor, and*hL*1-2 is the loss of hydraulic head from from point 1 to point 2.*p*1 and*p*2 to be equal and they cancel out of the equation. Because the reference point for z is arbitrary, we can choose the exit from the beer bong to be the reference point, making*z*2 equal to zero.Now the energy equation looks like this

According to the law of conservation of mass for incompressible fluids, the flow rate (unit volume per unit time) of the beer must be constant. We can use this to relate

*u*1 to*u*2.We can measure

*z*1, it's just how high the surface of the beer is above the end of the hose. If the hose is fully straightened,*z*1 is maximized, equal to*Lfh*+*Lfc*+*Lh*. Now if you want to use an easy approximation, you can assume that the head losses are negligible and the energy correction factors are both equal to 1.0. With these assumptions we can solve for the exit velocity directlywhere

*u*2 is in m/s if*z*is in metres and*g*is 9.807 m/s². You can use any units you want for*D*as long as you use the same units for both (e.g. you can't put one in inches and the other in millimetres). For velocity in cm/s,*z*is in cm and*g*= 980.7 cm/s². For velocity in ft/s,*z*is in ft and*g*= 32.18 ft/s².If you want volumetric flow rate, just add the following calculation step:

If you use centimetres for

*Dh*and cm/s for*u*2 (1 m = 100 cm), the flow rate will work out in mL/s. If you stick with metres for everything you'll get a pretty small number for*Q*because the units will be in m³/s (1 m³ = 1000 L).We can make this approximation even easier by assuming the funnel diameter is much larger than the hose diameter (which is probably true), making the denominator of the above velocity expression very nearly 1.0, and the exit velocity is simply

As you'll see later in an example, ignoring energy losses isn't going to give you a very accurate answer, and your friends aren't going to accept some lousy ballpark estimate. So the math's going to get more intense, but I paid good money for my fluid mechanics course in university and I'll be damned if I don't find a way to put that knowledge to use.

It's safe to assume turbulent flow in the hose, and although the beer is moving much more slowly in the funnel, it's probably also in the turbulent flow regime. The kinetic energy correction factor varies depending on fluid velocity, viscosity, and pipe roughness, but a typical number is about 1.05. I'm going to assume

*α*1 =*α*2 = 1.05.I'm going to assume hydraulic head losses come from two sources, friction inside the hose, and the flow contraction at the funnel cone. I'm ignoring the effect of the bend in the hose, which should be okay if the bend radius is much larger than the hose diameter, but if you put a tight bend in the hose you are introducing additional losses. For the flow contraction,

Where

*u*is the flow velocity leaving the contraction and*k*is an empirical factor that depends on the shape of the contraction. For typical funnel geometry,*k*should be around 0.07 to 0.08. I'll use 0.08. We can define a third point on the flow path, the exit of the funnel/entrance to the hose, but we won't need to do much with it. Since we've already assumed the funnel exit has the same diameter as the hose, the velocity at point 3 must be equal to the velocity at point 2 in order to satisfy the mass conservation law. Therefore, the head loss from point 1 to point 3 isThe friction loss in the hose is calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation

where

*f*is the Darcy friction factor,*L*is the pipe length,*D*is the pipe diameter, and*u*is the flow velocity in the pipe. For our beer bong, the head loss from point 3 to point 2 isNow things start to get more complicated. The friction factor is an empirical value that's a function of the pipe roughness, diameter, flow velocity, and fluid viscosity. But your beer bong's probably going to be made with smooth plastic or rubber hose, so we can assume a perfectly smooth pipe (i.e. ignore pipe roughness). If you're doing something crazy like using cast iron or bamboo or hollowed out whalebone, you might want to consider the pipe roughness.

The Colebrook equation is typically cited for calculating the friction factor, but it's an implicit equation, meaning you can't solve the friction factor directly, you need to solve using an iterative process. For a perfectly smooth pipe, the Colebrook equation is

where Re is the Reynolds number, which for the beer bong hose is equal to

where

*η*is the kinematic viscosity of the beer, typically about 1.8×10⁻⁶ m²/s, or 0.018 cm²/s. Thus,Since we still don't know what

*u*2 is yet, we have iterations upon iterations on our hands here. Good thing Excel can do all that for you. But if you want to solve it by hand you could cut down on your iterations by using Haaland's approximation of the Colebrook equation.You could also use the approximate value of

*u*2 to calculate the friction factor. It should get you a friction factor that's fairly close to the "exact" solution, so we can create a beastly-looking equation for*u*2 that will get pretty close to the same answer as the iterative solution from Excel.Substituting values of 980.7 cm/s² for

*g*and 0.018 cm²/s for*η*,where

*L*,*z*, and the*D*'s are in centimetres so that*u*2 comes out in cm/s.Let's do an example based on a hypothetical beer bong with some clever name like

*The Brain Cell Slayer*, depicted in the figure below.The Brain Cell Slayer |

__Volume____Initial velocity and flow rate (approximate solution)____Initial velocity and flow rate (more accurate solution)__Even though it's a smooth hose, friction has a pretty significant effect in this example, reducing the initial velocity of the beer by almost 40%. And just so you can see that our beastly-looking equation really does get you close to the "exact" iterative solution, here's what I get from Excel using the Colebrook equation for the friction factor:

__References__Potter, M.C. and Wiggert, D.C. (2002).

*Mechanics of Fluids, 3rd Edition*. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.
DR EMU WHO HELP PEOPLE IN ANY TYPE OF LOTTERY NUMBERS

ReplyDeleteIt is a very hard situation when playing the lottery and never won, or keep winning low fund not up to 100 bucks, i have been a victim of such a tough life, the biggest fund i have ever won was 100 bucks, and i have been playing lottery for almost 12 years now, things suddenly change the moment i came across a secret online, a testimony of a spell caster called dr emu, who help people in any type of lottery numbers, i was not easily convinced, but i decided to give try, now i am a proud lottery winner with the help of dr emu, i won $1,000.0000.00 and i am making this known to every one out there who have been trying all day to win the lottery, believe me this is the only way to win the lottery.

Dr Emu can also help you fix this issues

(1)Ex back.

(2)Herbal cure & Spiritual healing.

(3)You want to be promoted in your office.

(4)Pregnancy spell.

(5)Win a court case.

Contact him on email Emutemple@gmail.com

What’s app +2347012841542

Website Https://emutemple.wordpress.com/

Facebook page Https://web.facebook.com/Emu-Temple-104891335203341

This is the website I read about DR ISIKOLO and contacted him to help me get my ex boyfriend back to marry me during the month of August this year and I have come back here to post about him. Doctor Isikolo will help you solve your problem no matter what you are going through. My name is Anna Oscar. Posting about a spell caster is very strange to me because I never believed i will be able to say that I was helped by a spell caster in bringing my ex boyfriend back to me even when he left me due to infidelity and constant abuse and we fought severally and after 6 months of no contact. I read about Doctor Isikolo from other websites and contacted him to help me and in less than 48 hours my ex boyfriend called me and I was happy that he wants to get back to me. We met same month and he proposed to me. It was the most beautiful ring. Please everyone out here, Contact DR ISIKOLO to solve your problem for you and make you happy with your relationship that is hurting you. Love is the best feeling ever experienced. Email him at isikolosolutionhome@gmail.com You can also WhatsApp him on +2348133261196

ReplyDeleteGood day everybody, This is my testimony on how i won $4,200,201 million I want to use this opportunity to thank Great Priest Salami for helping me to win the lottery of $4,200,201 million dollars on Mega millions lottery ticket. I have been playing the lottery for the past 10 years now and I have never won. Ever since then I have not been able to win and I was so upset and I needed help to win the lottery. So I decided to go online and search for help, there i saw so many good testimonies about this man called Great Priest Salami of how he has cast lucky spell lotto for people to win the lottery. I contacted him also and told him I want to win a lottery, he cast a spell for me which I use and I played and won $4,200,201 million dollars. I am so grateful to this man, just in-case you also need him to help you win, you can contact him through his email: purenaturalhealer@gmail.com WhatsApp number +2348143757229

ReplyDelete